server-redis

npm:@modelcontextprotocol/server-redis@2025.4.25

Score

B92

Findings

Tools

Last scan

2026-06-05

Severity breakdown

Critical0

High2

Medium0

Low0

Info0

Worst finding

Tool `set` name implies a side effect that is not declared

· set

`set` looks like a side-effecting tool (its name contains a mutation verb), but its `side_effects` declaration is []. A policy synthesizer cannot produce safe rules for this tool because it cannot tell what it actually does.

fix: Declare the tool's true side effects explicitly. If the tool is genuinely read-only, rename it to match (e.g. `email.preview` rather than `email.send`).

All 2 findings

high
Tool `set` name implies a side effect that is not declared· setexcessive agency
`set` looks like a side-effecting tool (its name contains a mutation verb), but its `side_effects` declaration is []. A policy synthesizer cannot produce safe rules for this tool because it cannot tell what it actually does.
fix: Declare the tool's true side effects explicitly. If the tool is genuinely read-only, rename it to match (e.g. `email.preview` rather than `email.send`).
high
Tool `delete` name implies a side effect that is not declared· deleteexcessive agency
`delete` looks like a side-effecting tool (its name contains a mutation verb), but its `side_effects` declaration is []. A policy synthesizer cannot produce safe rules for this tool because it cannot tell what it actually does.
fix: Declare the tool's true side effects explicitly. If the tool is genuinely read-only, rename it to match (e.g. `email.preview` rather than `email.send`).

How this was scored

Source registry — tool surface extracted from the package's README + manifest (R3/R5/R6/R7 fire; schema-dependent rules deferred). Findings are emitted by the public capframe.findings.v1 schema. Score = 100 − (10·Critical + 4·High + 2·Medium + 1·Low), clamped to [0, 100].

Disagree with a finding? Open an issue.