v0.2.0 · live
CAPFRAME
§ serverregistryfindings.v2

mcp-server-sqlite

pypi:mcp-server-sqlite@2025.4.25

Score
B90
Findings
1
Tools
3
Last scan
2026-09-03

Severity breakdown

Critical1
High0
Medium0
Low0
Info0

Worst finding

Tool `Query Tools` exposes a code/command execution surface

· Query Tools

`Query Tools` looks like it executes code or shell commands (`read_query` - Execute SELECT queries to read data from the database - Input: - `query` (string): The SELECT SQL query to execute - Returns: Query results as array of objects - `write_query` - Execute INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE queries - Input: - `query` (string): The SQL modification query - Returns: `{ affected_rows: number }` - `create_table` - Create new tables in the database - Input: - `query` (string): CREATE TABLE SQL statement - Returns: Confirmation of table creation). Arbitrary execution is the maximal authority a tool can hold -- it subsumes every other caveat, so it should never be exposed to an agent without a hard sandbox and an explicit, narrowly-scoped capability.

fix: Do not expose raw code/shell execution to an agent. If unavoidable, run it in a disposable sandbox with no network + no host FS, gate it behind a capframe-bind capability scoped to an allow-list of commands, and require holder-of-key proof per call.

All 1 finding

  1. critical
    Tool `Query Tools` exposes a code/command execution surface· Query Toolsexcessive agency

    `Query Tools` looks like it executes code or shell commands (`read_query` - Execute SELECT queries to read data from the database - Input: - `query` (string): The SELECT SQL query to execute - Returns: Query results as array of objects - `write_query` - Execute INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE queries - Input: - `query` (string): The SQL modification query - Returns: `{ affected_rows: number }` - `create_table` - Create new tables in the database - Input: - `query` (string): CREATE TABLE SQL statement - Returns: Confirmation of table creation). Arbitrary execution is the maximal authority a tool can hold -- it subsumes every other caveat, so it should never be exposed to an agent without a hard sandbox and an explicit, narrowly-scoped capability.

    fix: Do not expose raw code/shell execution to an agent. If unavoidable, run it in a disposable sandbox with no network + no host FS, gate it behind a capframe-bind capability scoped to an allow-list of commands, and require holder-of-key proof per call.

How this was scored

Source registry tool surface extracted from the package's README + manifest (R3/R5/R6/R7 fire; schema-dependent rules deferred). Findings are emitted by the public capframe.findings.v1 schema. Score = 100 − (10·Critical + 4·High + 2·Medium + 1·Low), clamped to [0, 100].

Disagree with a finding? Open an issue.